Don't get me wrong - my own husband has a beard, and I like him juuuuust fine. But on Daniel? Really bad.
Yes. I agree. MS looks very handsome with or without beard. But for Daniel...just looked...odd to me.
But that's interesting what you say about Cam. He is more unstated as a presence--and to be fair, his characterization was a lot of flailing and inconsistent in Season Nine. For some, they were predisposed to accept him or loved him in spite of that (or because it was Browder), for other people it prevented connecting to him.
I hope you like jonas too (or at least Season Six with or without him).
And I love that, yes. That the Daniel I see and love is slightly different from Daniel and Tallulah Rasa's Daniel and Random's Daniel and Aby's Daniel and everyone else's Daniel. But much as some people's characterization might surprise me, I'd say that if a story clicks, then even if it's not an aspect of Daniel I'd write or even expect, then that author is speaking to the core of the character. I do hope that makes sense. :)
It does to me. And I'm still not sure if it's so much our views are the same of the core of the character or the writer's so good, they've convinced me their view of the character is right. Perhaps a combination thereof?
no subject
Don't get me wrong - my own husband has a beard, and I like him juuuuust fine. But on Daniel? Really bad.
Yes. I agree. MS looks very handsome with or without beard. But for Daniel...just looked...odd to me.
But that's interesting what you say about Cam. He is more unstated as a presence--and to be fair, his characterization was a lot of flailing and inconsistent in Season Nine. For some, they were predisposed to accept him or loved him in spite of that (or because it was Browder), for other people it prevented connecting to him.
I hope you like jonas too (or at least Season Six with or without him).
And I love that, yes. That the Daniel I see and love is slightly different from Daniel and Tallulah Rasa's Daniel and Random's Daniel and Aby's Daniel and everyone else's Daniel. But much as some people's characterization might surprise me, I'd say that if a story clicks, then even if it's not an aspect of Daniel I'd write or even expect, then that author is speaking to the core of the character. I do hope that makes sense. :)
It does to me. And I'm still not sure if it's so much our views are the same of the core of the character or the writer's so good, they've convinced me their view of the character is right. Perhaps a combination thereof?